robotics

Not only are the Loose Change folks unafraid to question the validity of the theory that nineteen Arab hijackers pulled off 9/11 (and I don't agree with their every assertion) but now they have firmly pointed a finger at Offut AFB as the seat of control for Operation Two Towers (if you believe those were war "games" then let's just say this message is not for you). Offut (USSTRATCOM) is where Warren Buffet was on that day!

Was the op run from Building Seven?

The Bush administration is launching a new government agency that will rely heavily on private security contractors to conduct surveillance in the U.S.  Click here for more at my other blog.

The following is snipped from Government plans to use Flight 93 cockpit tapes in Moussaoui trial: "An official for NetJets, a company that sells shares in private business aircraft, confirmed that the plane tracking Flight 93 belonged to the company. The official, who asked not to be identified by name, said the company was asked not to comment on the Sept. 11 flight but would not say who made the request."

As usual, when anyone jumps onto the remote piloting "theory" they miss one very major point: that Israel and Saudi Arabia have, for some time now, worked very closely with each other in fields related to satellite technologies.

You have been lied to by people that are experts at lying, some of them decorated 9/11 researchers. NO ONE is immune to manipulation. I merely was in a good position at the time of the attacks to notice a few things that others weren't. I hope you will consider my research. I am willing to answer any questions you might have.

The National Reconaissance Office, Mitre Corporation, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, and Booz, Allen, & Hamilton

When I wrote this piece (10-06-06) I was under some false impressions, namely that the particular research on September 11, 2001 that I initiated had sat unexplored during my two year absence from the internet. It turns out it hasn't and even some that ridiculed my research at the time have picked up this particular ball and run with it. That said for the purpose of context, I hope you find this enlightening.

Snip: "The military and scientific leaders chartering neuroweapons research will argue that the United States is a uniquely noble country that can be trusted with such technologies, while other countries (except for a few allies) cannot. They will also argue that these technologies will save lives and that U.S. ingenuity will enable the United States to dominate other countries in a neuroweapons race."

The militarization of neuroscience
By Hugh Gusterson
| 10 April 2007

So you think you've heard it all on 9/11, eh? I sincerely doubt it unless you are familiar with the research of a handful of people whose discoveries were so unnerving to the establishment that it sicked some of its biggest 9/11 gatekeepers on them, gatekeepers that are, themselves, erroneously thought of as being legitimate journalists and by that I mean thought of as legitimate by the resistance. Hey, we can all be fooled.