If a Pentagon "nuke" exploded in a forest in Tajikistan..but there were no American's around to hear it...would it still be a Nuclear Explosion? what many may not realize is that the "early" NSC adopted "Limited War Strategy" to further US interests in a Post-War Nuclear Age. According to Kissinger, "Limited Nuclear War" was a completely valid operation of the "Limited War Strategy" ethos. In addition to "limited nuclear war" it appears that Nixon was a primary "in house" promoter of "assassination as a tool in the Limited War arsenal".
It is NOT clear whether or not, at the time that the NSC was first organized whether or not "assassination" was restricted to "international"! Since, the NSC was compulsed concerning "Communist Global Threat" and the "Communist/LEftist" inside the US...it would make perfect sense that "internal communist threats" could be met with "force"...without restraint by Constitutional limitations.
It is however clear, there was a time when "domestic" assassination was considered . Now is the time to review your connections between the National Security Counsel and The Council on Foreign Relations. It must have been a confusing time for Nixon...when he was in command of foreign assassinations and "security actions" against internal security threats.
If kennedy had exposed the "offshoring" truth...wouldn't he and bobby have been a threat to the US battle against communism?
zorromaniac
Post new comment